Following is the editorial process that every manuscript submitted to the journal undergoes a peer review process.
Editor-in-Chief of Osmania Journal of Management Peer reviewed Journal (OJM), inspects the submitted manuscript. If the Editor-in-Chief determines that the manuscript is not of sufficient in quality to go through the normal review work flow or if the subject of the manuscript is not appropriate to the journal's scope, then he rejects the manuscript without further processing.
If the Editor-in-Chief determines that the submitted manuscript is of sufficient quality and falls within the scope of the journal, he sends the manuscript to one or more external reviewers for peer-review. These external reviewers will be selected by the Editor-in-Chief from the list of potential reviewers / editorial board members selected by OJM Editorial board’s apex committee based on their availability for a quality review. Most of the times, the review committee will comprise only a subset of the global editorial board due to non-availability of a common timeframe window and the inability of members to allocate quality time for a thorough review and scrutiny of research papers. Editor-in-Chief will be in touch with all the board members frequently to ascertain their available bandwidth and accordingly select the subset. This subset may vary from edition to edition and the selection process is left to the discretion of Editor-in-Chief.
An edited document in which spelling / grammar errors and typos have been corrected changes and suggestions if any, to improve clarity, flow, structure and readability tracked revisions; so that author(s) can see and review all the changes that have been made.
<2021
>